<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Geeks on Steroids &#187; Google Search Engine Optimization</title>
	<atom:link href="http://yourmyrant.com/tag/google-search-engine-optimization/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://yourmyrant.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 17:59:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Google Search Engine Optimization</title>
		<link>http://yourmyrant.com/16/google-search-engine-optimization/</link>
		<comments>http://yourmyrant.com/16/google-search-engine-optimization/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 12:42:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO Rants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Search Engine Optimization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yourmyrant.com/?p=16</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I even spent 2 hours on the phone yesterday trying to convince a potential client that it is better to be #1 on page 1 then #1 on page 4. The argument put fourth is that you will convert a higher percent of traffic by being on page four then being on page 1. However, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://yourmyrant.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/rant2.jpg"><img src="http://yourmyrant.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/rant2.jpg" alt="" title="rant" width="260" height="213" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-18" /></a> I even spent 2 hours on the phone yesterday trying to convince a potential client that it is better to be #1 on page 1 then #1 on page 4.</p>
<p>The argument put fourth is that you will convert a higher percent of traffic by being on page four then being on page 1. However, the only reason someone would be looking on page 4 is if;</p>
<p><strong>A.	They couldn’t find what they were looking for on page 1, 2 or 3.</p>
<p>B.	They are not really wanting to buy anything but rather looking for information.</p>
<p>C.	They are the competition and are just checking out the competition. </strong></p>
<p>The fact is that many SEO’s can’t rank you on page 1 so it is better to try and sale you on the illusion that page 4 rankings are better than page 1 rankings.</p>
<p>Take a look at the clickthrough as a % of the TOTAL clickthroughs for a search term:</p>
<p><strong>#1: Will receive 42.3%<br />
#2: Will receive 11.92%<br />
#3: Will receive 8.44%<br />
#4: Will receive 6.03%<br />
#5: Will receive 4.86%<br />
#6: Will receive 3.99%<br />
#7: Will receive 3.37%<br />
#8: Will receive 2.98%<br />
#9: Will receive 2.83%<br />
#10: Will receive 2.79%</strong></p>
<p>Before you buy SEO from a company that is trying to sale you on how good it is to be on page 4, take a look at the above numbers and ask yourself how much traffic you will be missing out on by not being number 1 on page 1.</p>
<p>Oh…and to give you an idea of that the top of page to looks like, on average it only receives about 0.66% of the total clickthrough&#8217;s. </p>
<p>If you want to be a bottom feeder, feeding off what others have left behind then go for the top of page 4, otherwise to succeed you need position one, page one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://yourmyrant.com/16/google-search-engine-optimization/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

